My WebSite

The Batman, Zodiac, and the Obsession with Obsessions.

I’ll just say this about The Batman: I loved it. But obviously, this is a much different ideation of the Batman/Bruce Wayne character. There’s a brooding Nirvana B-side sprinkled into the trailer and into the film itself—twice. This is the The Last Temptation of Christ of Batman movies. We’re dealing with the human side of both Batman and Bruce Wayne. This Batman miscalculates. In voice-over, he talks to us. He convinces us to like him as a person before we like him as a superhero. And he is a scary-ass Batman. I’ve never been scared of Batman until now. To me, he is like a constructive version of Travis Bickle. He diaries. He is displeased with his city. There is so much scum on the streets. Crime everywhere. He wants to fix it. But he doesn’t know how to yet. As someone pointed out to me, “We are watching his inexperience as the Caped Crusader, and his growing skills as Batman will be important to watch over the sequels.”

 

If you revisit the portrayals by Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer or even Christian Bale, Bruce Wayne is a high-brow stud-old-money, cocky, flirtatious. But Pattinson’s Bruce is searching for something else beyond the superficial. And the filmmaker, Matt Reeves, leans into this aspect of the character and leads with it. It makes this portrayal so different. This Batman is conducting a social experiment on his hometown. He doesn’t want to meet with accountants or go to charity balls. He doesn’t trust Alfred nor does he fully appreciate Alfred’s role. In fact, it seems this Bruce looks at Alfred as more of a nuisance, a representation of a generation he wants to sever ties with. A far cry from Michael Gough’s or Michael Caine’s daddy stand-in.

Robert Pattinson as the Caped Crusader in The Batman

And speaking of fathers, Thomas Wayne, in this iteration a doctor turned politician, is not lionized here and is presented, depending on who you speak to, as a good man or a scumbag. Sound familiar to our present media and political landscape? And as Bruce finds out the truth about his father by getting deeper and deeper into the investigation of the Riddler murders, he unravels that his father made one fatal mistake. Thomas Wayne made a decision, 20 years before the start of the film (or so), and now the entire city is paying for it. Unlike the way we sometimes aggrandize the dead, and perhaps that was the case in the prior Batman films, here, we have to face the cold, hard truth that even though we may want to crystalize the memory of a loved one in gold, that’s not always the truth. Again, a far cry from Nolan’s billionaire, philanthropist-doctor who taught us to face our fears.

This is a story more akin to the sins of the father being borne by the son. The scenario in The Batman could just as easily have been lifted from The Godfather films than anything in the superhero genre. The Batman’s DNA isn’t really shared with superhero or even comic book films, but with New Hollywood (or New Hollywood inspired) downer films. We have already mentioned Last Temptation, but even that film’s parentage can be traced back to perhaps the most New Hollywood-downer film of all time, Taxi Driver.

The films I’ve seen it compared to most are Zodiac and Chinatown, two pretty epic downers. Take Zodiac as an example. (Clearly inspired by All The President’s Men and yes, Chinatown.) Every character in that film, not just the stars, are as infatuated with the subject haunting their city as the next guy. In both cases a tapped, out-of-his-damn-mind serial killer. The reason we love Zodiac so much, besides the obsessive nature of the characters in relation to the goal, is because every character, whether they’re significant or appear only in one scene, has the same goal—and the same downfall—and they gift their obsession the audience, and we become obsessed.

Still from Zodiac. Cartoonist Robery Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) discusses the case with reporter Paul Avery (Robert Downey, Jr.)
 

Here is the goal: Catch the Zodiac. Here is the downfall: They just fucking can’t. So the filmmaker purposefully tells us we can’t have it the way we want it. Why? Well, the law is too ambiguous. The shadow of a doubt stretches too far. One little detail prevents an arrest. It’s not fair to us as an audience to walk away without closure, but it is realistic. And each character deals with this tragedy (it is tragic) in their own way—alcoholism, paranoia, ambivalence, isolation. The unending mystery, the uselessness of their efforts, destroys them.

The same can be said of the characters in The Batman. Jim Gordon allows Batman into the fold rather openly (unlike the rest of the franchise) and allows him to piece together the clues of each crime. He is just as much of a detective as the boys in blue. But the murders become more grisly and the riddles more complex.
 
Eventually, Batman realizes the futility of his plan to stop the Riddler, because the murders are bigger than one man or simply, a group of criminals. They involve the top elected officials in Gotham, government hacks, cops, and the mob. (There’s your Chinatown comparison.) The end of the Riddler’s killing spree will birth a new wave of disenfranchisement of the “system.” The case becomes too big. It involves too many players. And Batman, and Gordon, and Selina and Annika and Falcone and Colson and everyone else, pays the price for it.
And that level of manipulation wears on the audience as much as the characters. One day, we’ll be getting ready to go out for the night, and flip on the HBOMAX app to kill some time, and we’ll start The Batman. And it will consume us just as Zodiac consumes us. It will allow us to maybe find something this time to help solve the mystery. But in the end, we won’t. Because both films are dealing with, to quote The Dark Knight, “a different class of criminal.”
 
So let’s discuss both those films for a moment, because they are obviously going to be measured against each other for a very long time. (And a deep-dive on this subject is forthcoming.) The Dark Knight also deals with government corruption and the mob. But it lacks the sub-layer present in The Batman, and that layer is the nihilistic, nothing-you-can-do-about-it-angle that films like Zodiac and Chinatown take.
 
If I could describe it as briefly as possible, I’d say that TDK is about the chaos Joker inflicts onto the city, and how he brings out the worst in people by exploiting what they love the most. However, there is closure in that film, because Batman takes the fall for Harvey Dent’s crimes and disappears for 8 years. The Joker’s reign of terror effectively ends. Not the case with the Riddler’s plan. The Riddler not only murders people, he opens up the public’s eyes to the rampant chaos and corruption that has been hurting the people of Gotham for years. And its all true. TDK ends on a lie, The Batman doesn’t.
 
So then what is the better film? We may never know. But like Zodiac, and like Chinatown, and like several other films that don’t let us walk out of the theater on an upbeat note, we continue to think about them in more ways than the adrenaline of a chase, or the humor of a line, or an ear-splitting Dolby explosion. We think about why in the world can’t we just watch this film again and solve the crime. The Batman does not achieve this affect as well as the previously mentioned films. But that’s the kind of film it aspires to be. And that’s why we will keep going back to it for more. Bring on the sequels.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Related Posts

Islands – Music Video Treatment

During initial discussions with the band My Goodness, they wanted to create a certain mood – of sadness, loss, confusion. They wanted it to feel

She Wore A Yellow Ribbon (1949)

Not the greatest installment in Ford’s catalogue. The story never really reaches an apex and feels like it ends several times. However, Ford still manages

Get in Touch!

The vertical frame is our new canvas. This is where creators and influencers deliver content directly to their followers.